1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9

 
S.03-36
-1
0
?
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
MEMORANDUM
_-
Senate
J. H. Waterhouse, Chair,
Senate Committee on Enrollment Mpgement and
Admission of Associate Degree
Colleges
February 13, 2003
from BC Colleges and University
In 1991, Senate approved a policy whereby students who had completed the
requirements for an Associate Degree from a BC College or University College and who had an
admission GPA of 2.00 or more would be granted admission to SFU.
Action undertaken by the Senate Committee on Enrollment Management and Planning
(SCEMP) at its meeting of February 5, 2003 gives rise to the following motion.
Motion 1:
"That Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors that
commencing in 2004-3, the minimum admission average for Associate
Degree students will be allowed to float above 2.00 and will be established
each semester at 0.25 GPA points less than that required for regular
transfer students.
At the time the current Senate policy was approved, it was envisioned that the number of Associate
degree students seeking admission would be small in relation to the number of regular transfer
students. This is no longer the case. In 2002/03, 490 students transferred to SFU with an Associate
Degree, nearly 30% of all transfer students.
Analysis of the incoming transfer students shows that the average admission GPA of Associate
Degree students is about 2.64 and for regular transfer students about
3.19.
Roughly 15% of the
Associate Degree students are admitted with a GPA of 3.00 or more while about 70% of the regular
transfer students have a GPA of 3.00 or more.
The disparity in admission grades has the natural consequence that regular transfer students
outperform associate degree students academically at each stage of their progress through SFU and
graduate with higher grades.
It should be recognized that the academic performance of associate degree students is in fact better
than that the regular transfer students, if one controls for admission GPA. Also, it can be argued that
the set of college courses taken by associate degree students is harder, more likely to meet W, Q and
B criteria, and supply a better grounding for degree completion than those courses taken by regular
transfer students. This is manifested in the respectable degree completion rates for Associate
degree students. For these reasons we should encourage college students to take associate
• ?
degrees by allowing for a lower admission GPA than for regular transfer students. A careful
analysis of the performance data for both groups was carried out and indicated that a differential of
0.25 was warranted and would result in similar post-transfer performance at SFU.

 
Analysis of Academic Performance
. ?
B.C. College Transfer Students
Associate Degree vs non-Associate Degree Students
Currently at SFU, transfer students from
B.C.
colleges with an associate degree
(BCASD)
are
admitted with a
GPA
of 2.00 or higher. For those without an associate degree
(BCCOL),
specific
minimum averages are set depending on intake quotas. The issue is whether this admission policy
still makes sense in light of the fact that the number of students admitted as
BCASDs is
growing at a
rapid rate.
In
1999/00,
BCASDs
made up 10% of all
B.C.
college transfers. In 2002/03, this proportion has grown
to 28%. In raw numbers, the number admitted as
BCASD
has grown from 145 in 1999/00 to 490 in
2002103. This is a 240% increase.
The purpose of this report is to compare the
academic
performance of
BCASD
and
BCCOL
students
after admission to SFU.
This report splits
BCCOLs
by those who are admitted with fewer than 30 transfer hours and those
who have completed 30 or more transfer hours. Those admitted with fewer than 30 hours are quite
small and while the data will be reported separately for this group in the enclosed tables, the analysis
will deal mainly with
BCCOLs
who complete 30 or more transfer hours before coming to SFU.
Table I summarizes the admission of
BCASDs
and
BCCOLs
over the last 4 years and shows the
rapid growth in the admission of
BCASDs.
Table 2 provides information on the average number of transfer credits these students come to SFU
with. On average,
BCASDs
are admitted to SFU with approximately 60 transfer credits from a post-
secondary
institution.
BCCOLs
are admitted with just under 50 transfer credits.
Table 3 shows that 10-16% of
BCASDs
are admitted to SFU with an admission
GPA
of 3.00 or higher
each year. For
BCCOLs,
61-77% are admitted with a
GPA
of 3.00 or higher. The average
GPA
of
BCASD5
admitted is 2.64 over the last 4 years. For
BCCOLs,
the average is 3.19.
At graduation from SFU, the
CGPA
of
BCASDs
continues to be lower than the
CGPA
achieved by
BCCOLs.
On average, the
CGPA
of
BCASDs
at time of graduation is 2.88. For
BCCOLs,
the average
CGPAis
3.06.
Table 3 shows that a higher proportion of
BCASDs
graduate from SFU. 53% of the 1999/00
BCASD
cohort has graduated vs 42% of
BCCOLs.
For the 2000/01 cohort, the graduation rate is 22% vs
15%, respectively. The fact that
BCASDs
have more credits at time of admission (see Table 2)
explains much of this
discrepancy.
-2-
Tables 4 and 5 provide information on the
academic
performance of
BCASDs
and
BCCOLs
as they
progress through SFU. The average
CGPA
for these students is shown by number of credit hours
completed. This table shows that
BCCOLs
outperform
BCASDs
at each stage of their progress
through SFU. In this analysis, the graduation
CGPA is
based on the semester a degree is completed if
a student completes both a degree and another credential, such as a certificate or diploma. If a
S ?
student is pursuing both a degree and a
certificate/diploma
and the student is awarded the
certificate/diploma,
the graduation
CGPA is
based on completion of the certificate or diploma.
2

 
Table 6 provides information on students who have not graduated from SFU as of January 11, 2003.
An average of 58% of BCASDs who have not yet graduated are in good academic standing at SFU.
For BCCOLs, 75% are still in good academic standing.
SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
NEW BCASD AND BCCOL STUDENTS ADMITTED AND REGISTERED AT SRi
1999-2 TO 2003-1
source: bcasdqts
Table I
Summary b y
Year of Admission and Basis of Admission CateQory
Year
BCASD
B=L(40)
BOCOL(>-30)
Total %BCASD
1999/00
145
16
1,304
1,465
10%
2000101
245
16
1,466
1,727
14%
2001102
333
13
1,118
1,464
23%
2002103
490
6
1257
1.753
28%
Table
Averaie
2
?
Transfer Credit Hours b
y
Basis of Admission Cateaorv
0
Boa
Cohort
ThHrs
Arage
Tfr Hours
:' ?
N
BCASD
1999/00
>40
61.1
145
2000/01
>z30
61.4
245
2001/02
>40
61.8
333
2002/03 >40
62.3
490
BCCOL
1999100
<30
24.4
16
2000/01
40
26.0
16
2001102 <30
24.6
13
2002/03
<30
22.7
6
BCCOL
1999/00
>40
49.5
1,304
2000/01 >=30
48.6
1,466
2001/02 >40
48.7
1,118
2002103 >=30
48.3
1,257
3

 
C1 ?
17*-lu
-. -
'fCt S .
300
AVIMIp
AóiA
(ke
MiI8
Cmdu.
. ?
200648 2.936262 300.3.46
?
Nuamri
CA861 10 >.30
51
74
14
14!
14%
266
Ti
53%
2D08l
NoW
lOS
108
22
10
24
13%
2.81
ZIP
84
22%
200IM2
NoW
1
120
179
27
8
10%
2.62
3629
2
1%
3 >.30
1
168
242
88
13
46
13%
2.86
0%
SOCCX l66O0 ?
0
0
4
4
2
Ii
521
Z82
4
24%
001
?
.0
B
6
1
I
Ii
44%
3.03
0%
200102
40
3
3
4
3
1!
54%
3.27
0%
29G<90
I
3
2
331
0%
BCDC1. 1628O0 3,00
14
323
706
247
4
1.00
74%
3.20
&DS
564
46%
2X9l
>.30
1
21
643
669
241
1
1 486
61%
3,14
3L 00
217
15%
2O11U2 3..30
4
25
22S
814
243
7
I ?
Iii
77%
3.22
341
14
1%
2tXQ4)3 ,.30
27
408
538
247
I
I
24
03%
320
0%
r
lOiIil
.' ?
ai-ii- 4Mm
al-li
AquO3PA
iHm. al-ti
lOSHru 3.12)-1
_____
C.A) 1628fl0 3,w3G
268
2.71
277
2.80
268
2.89 ?
3 Is
2.84
2000M
NoW
263
2.72
278
2.80
268
2.92
2001102 >.30
267
2.85
308
329
0003
>.30
200
BCOCS. 16200 c30
264
2.70
268
2.91
313
3.53
2.82
2000101
.c30
278
2.83
268
3.31
2001102
0
308
3.03
xe o
BOOM 162OO
..30
262
2.62
296
2.99
314
340 ?
34
3.05
2D1
>.30
268
2.62
301
3.06
3
3.36 ?
291
3.08
Z1102 >.30
268
308
308
2.90
3.40
03
..30
296
_______
1711-lu -
3D-Pu..
4WIt
8(1-lu
7014m
al-li
lOSHri12)-ti
Maw
CA00 100
>30
.
118
108
100
32
18
7 ?
1
77
21
..30
168
163
117
10
3
0 ?
C
54
201
102
>.30
162
57
14
0
0
0
?
C
2
.30
1
0
0
0
0
0 ?
C
0
BCDCL 16200
'em
14
13
11
8
5
2 ?
C
4
0
12
11
6
1
0
0 ?
C
0
2X1102
<30
9
3
0
0
0
0
?
C
0
2CCD30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BCDOL 10
>.30
1 068
1811
92B
444
118
554
2000101 >30
l.1
961
679
116
21
217
2001102
>.30
647
214
41
I
0
L
41i
14
2002W
>30
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

 
.
Fairtmer Ex
:-eG
-CAP ?
INF ?
El] ?
OAP ?
PW
?
RTW ?
ME T %GA
CA ?
100 ?
.
.30
2000101
as
1315
4
8
1
5
4
5
8
1
2
IC'
28
4
8
Ill
57%
71%
2001102 ?
.
.30
258
18
1
2
11
25
16
331
78
2003 ?
..30
192
1
52
3
242
480
29!
L 1VO
AM
11
1
12
%
2000101 ?
0
13
1
2
16
81%
2(1)1102 tW
10
1
2
13
77%
2CC08 ?
0
4
2
6
87%
BOOCI. 1910O ?
.uSO
S75
17
S
a
42
4
41
57
750
77
20
00M ?
..30
1,012
24
3
4
3
100
58
1,248
84%
2001102 >.30
94
21
1
5
38
40
57
1,1D4
88%
X03 >.30
751
10
6
117
11
358
1.257
60%
GAS .odaamcwg
CAP
ccrUnUng an pia
IF • hoiloft W r.g1 ?
P grades Mil 2 i.niI.r81.
113 a UtMtD rr (03PA 1.00 kilt 2 nw)
CMP -
on
?
IT* jDb48o4t
Pñ' u
sad vW
W
rm
n
l
P1W
required eda.
.

 
.
r
.
0
?
Cl)
C-i CM
cor-
CD ?
IL)
(O(DC')CD
Ui
co
J
IC Z
ch
CM
000
og
t
o
CM ?
.0
U.
Z0C4a
co
E
C'
.80OO
o!a)e
(I)Z,-u,
_WC
C)
)O
?
I-
.0
.e
W
c o)000
.0
00)000
Jc'Jc'i
co
I—
IL)
CM
It)
?
C')
1w
0
.-.--
CD CD C') CO
C-C
0(0.-U)
(0
co
N
0(ON
U)COr-C')
VWVN
0)0(0(0
...•O(D(O(O(0
ClC'J0JC
p 0000
0000
C')C')C')C')
0000
P-
II ?
II
?
II
?
II
AAAA
C')
V
C
V
l ) C
V
l ) C')
V
A
U
?
A
II
?
A
II
?
A
II
0
?
cm cn
cm
U-04
C1C'J
.-00CI1
C'1CJC1
0
0
AEC
0
0

 
.
a)
04
'()OOO
CM
(1UO
Lis
4
C4
CY cJcJcl
C')C)C')()
()C)C')C)
LJ1A
T ?
u
in ?
0
co
CD C) CO
.-.-.-
Co
(D
?
CO
F-
LO
c'J_c)
•.-F-.-
-OCOOCOC')
,-
?
qq .-C g
F-C')t-
c1C'JC'JC'J
Lf)
?
Go
COC')C')
a.
O(DI)
Cf)
COCOC').-
in ?
C04
cm CM
--
AL
_0000
C') C') C') C
l )
0 0 0 0
0000
C') CO CO C')
II
?
II
?
II
?
II
II
?
II
?
II
?
II
1 AAAA
C')
C') C') CO
VVVV
A A A A
a
.-
CO,
C1 C
?
CJ
Im
C'1 C'J CJ
C1 CJ CJ
co
co
co
0
rig

 
.
C'JO)
aC'1
??
CM
OR
?
OO
tt)O
cicici ?
cj ?
C5CC5
C) ?
C)C\J
ii
! O)
C)U) ??
0CC
C')
c'J ?
C)
I
I00
OD
CD
?
C) ?
O)
c
. Jc'J ?
c) ?
C) C)
0O ?
cc ?
O)CDO
c,
(' ?
oCC
C1C)C'J
0CJ C%J
iC)
r- co c ?
CC CC ?
co
0)0
CMc\l C ?
C1 Cl ?
C'1 C) C)
C
V ) CM
cjcsj ?
cic) ?
C%Jcgo)
1
fCOCCNO
COCCc0
0
CCt-0 ?
CCCCO)0)
U) LO
C
4
4
C%JC'1CJ
?
CMC1C) ?
CJ C%1
0
II
?
0
C)C)c)
II
?
0
II
?
0
II
?
?
?
0)
0000
?
C') ?
C
O )
?
0)
?
?
0
CCC)C)C')
II ?
0
H ?
0
II
?
0
II
A A A A ?
V V V V ?
A A A A
O000
0 — Cl. 0)
??
0
000
— C\ 0)
0
0
0
?
00
C1
Ig
p
o
0)0
0)
88g88
ggg
C1 Ci C'1 ?
CJ
NC'1 ?
CJ C%1 C%I
0
-J ?
?
-J
0
.
o0
0
0
??
0
0
co ?
co
'000
CY
—000 ?
0000 ?
0)00
rCM
fF
. 000
C'PJOOO ?
CC00
Lo
CC
C') 00
?
U) 000
?
CC
.-
C'.,
00
— ?
P
'5
04 000
?
CC —
00
?
CO
C0
0
.00
E
z
_c000
CM r-
coc')r-oc').-C')O
?
CC.-'0
COCOC'J.-
C'J0)0 ?
0)C')I--
0000
?
0000
-x
C') co C') co ?
0000
?
C') co C') co
?
•,
AAAA
II ?
II
?
II
?
II
?
?
co
VVVV
?
C l )
?
C') ?
C')
?
?
AAAA
II
?
II
?
II
?
II
0)0— ?
o)QJ
0)000 ?
0)000 ?
0) 000
• ;Q0)00o
U.-04CPJC'1
0)0
—CJCPJ
?
0C0'J ?
C%JCJCJ
0)000
0 ?
.I
0 ?
0
C)
?
0
'30
0
?
0
_co
CC ?
co
.
U,
C)
.0
I
C)
-

 
U)
OW
E
CY
cm
cn
LLQ c
cc
?
•cc
'•--
0
C
0. . •
0.
V
C
o -
W
- --•C
CD 0
o E
C0V
w
V
1V
ru
Q. II II
?
II
LL
?
CL
O0
o-
I
C
V
C
U)
C.)
V
E
0
•1
0
V
0
V
0
0
.
(0
0
.0
r- ?
-
?
o)
Ior- r-.c)
c'J.-rr
O)NCD
r-
N(0(0
.- o
.--0
(0O)C)O)
CicDc)cO
.-.-.-
OOF-
r.-C'J.-CJ
C.1
N- C)t-
(D
c..l
U) U) U)
4
r
0 ?
to
C'
cm
CJ
00.
v
cm
v
C)
Ai U) CD. — C1
— ?
(
C.J ?
CD F
CD
C9 Ln v
cm
.-
O)U)CD
z
--
.-
:
.4
0
O)U)CDC\1
.-C')0
.-.-
U)%1F
a, r-
0000
Cl?
)C)C)
I
?
II
?
II
?
It
0000
C) C) C') C')
0000
C)C'))C")
II
?
It
?
II II
(AAAA
VVVV A A A A
S88 88
CIJC'U
.-
CM0404
.- 01 C\iC1
.

Back to top