S.09-113
For Information
?
1
0 ?
()J:I:ICJ 01 T
HE
VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC ANI) PROVOST
MEMO
ATTENTION:
Senate
FROM: ?
Jonathan Driver, Vice-President, Academic & Provost
?
z
RE: ?
Process to Review Agreement with Fraser Internation
?
^
btLee
DATE: ?
September 15, 2009
?
'
/ \
A review of the operations of Fraser International Cotge, a their impacts on Simon
Fraser University, must be undertaken prior to the en date o the current contract?
?
• ?
term. The term of the current contract ends March 31,
At the March 2006 meeting of Senate at which the academic affiliation with IBT Ltd (now
Navitas), the parent company of FIC was proposed, the following commitments were
made as part of the motion to approve the agreement with FIC.
By June 2010, the Vice-President Academic will prepare a report for Senate with a
recommendation on whether the F/C affiliation agreement should be renewed in March
2011. The report will address the following issues:
1.
The academic performance of students who transfer from F/C to SFU;
2.
The number of students who transfer to SFU, their country of origin, the
programs into which they transfer, and the number who transfer to other
institutions;
3.
Actions taken by SFU to increase its own international student recruitment and
increase undergraduate student retention;
4.
An analysis of increases to Departmental workloads resulting from academic
oversight of F/C;
5.
Any concerns that F/C instructors have regarding working conditions;
6.
The use of funds received by SFU as a consequence of the F/C affiliation.
The commitment was made that the report containing the information above would be
provided to Senate in sufficient time so that the findings would form part of the overall
discussion about renewal of the relationship with the College.
As part of its regular business, the SFU-FIC Academic Advisory Committee produces
SIMON FRASER
UNIVERSITY
?
THINKING OF THE WORLD
OFFICE OFT HE VICE-PRESIDENT, ACADEMIC AND PROVOST
is
annual reports to Senate, expecting that information included in the reports would form
a key part of a larger report, prior to contract renewal. Thus far, two annual reports
(reflecting the 2006-2007, and 2007-2008 academic years) have been produced and
forwarded to Senate. A third annual report will be produced in Fall, 2009.
Although a detailed process for review of the academic aspects of the SFU-FIC
relationship has not yet been finalized, in addition to addressing the questions above,
the review will include:
• ?
data on enrollments, retention, transfers and graduation rates;
• feedback from FIC students (current, and transferred to SFU);
• data from a survey of FIC instructors;
• ealuation data from SFU departmental Course Coordinators;
• feedback from SFU's participating departments; and
• a summary of feedback received from consultations with the SFU community
(consultations to be led by the Vice-President Academic and the Associate Vice-
President- Students and International in fall 2009).
SFU has lengthy and positive experience with the process of regular external review of
academic units. The ER is a useful model to adopt for the review of the relationship
with FIC. Adapting and utilizing this model, with external and internal reviewers
working with terms of reference related to the questions above, would provide my office
and Senate with an objective review of how the relationship with FIC is working. A
document paralleling a department self-study" would be prepared by staff of the
VPA's office prior to the review, supplemented by survey data and information collected
from community consultations, Institutional Research and Planning, SFU International,
Student Services, FIC, and from academic units involved in offering courses at FtC. SFU
and FtC would need to reach agreement regarding the composition of the review team.
It is anticipated that the review process would take place early in the 2009- 2010
academic year, thereby allowing sufficient time for the necessary information to be
collected and compiled for discussion at Senate no later than June, 2010.
Draft Terms of Reference for the Review
The purpose of the external review process is to examine the extent to which:
• The quality of FIC's teaching is high and there are measures in place to ensure
standards are maintained at SFU levels or better;
• The quality of the student experience at FtC is high, and students leave FtC well
prepared for study at SFU;
• ?
FIC is meeting the recruitment objectives agreed to with SFU in the affiliation
agreement;
?
0
SIMON FRASEfl UNIVERSITY
?
THINKING OF THE WORLD
()iuICE 01
.
1 lIE VICE-I'RESIDIiNT, ACADEMIC AND PROVOST
• The qualifications and working conditions of FIC instructors are comparable to
those of SFU sessional instructors;
• There are adequate resources and facilities provided to support teaching,
including laboratory equipment, computing, and preparation space;
• The involvement of SFU instructors in quality assurance processes is
reasonable in terms of work load;
• ?
SFU academic units involved with FIC are satisfied with the relationship, the
?
processes, and the funds provided to the department by the VPA office.
The Review Committee will address the specific questions required by Senate, assess
the academic and administrative linkages between SFU and FIC, and comment on
strengths and weaknesses, on opportunities for change and/or improvement, and on
quality and effectiveness including safeguards for academic standards.
. ?
The Review Committee should make essential, formal, prioritized recommendations
that address major issues, with reference to the resources available and to the
objectives described in the SFU-FIC partnership agreement.
Review team members will be chosen according to the following principles:
• ?
Faculty members with expertise in international education or international
issues
• ?
No administrative role at SFU at the level of Chair or higher
• ?
No previous involvement with Fraser International College or Navitas
Education Ltd.
• A minimum of three reviewers, with at least one internal and one external
reviewer
In summary, Senate can expect to receive the following documents when it considers the
recommendation from the Vice-President Academic concerning the advisability of renewing,
modifying, or not renewing the relationship between SFU and FIC:
• Three annual reports to Senate
• A self-study document containing data relevant to a review of the SFU-FIC
relationship
• The instructions to the external review team
• The report of the external review team
?
-
• A response to the external review from the Vice-President Academic
.
3.
SIMON FRASOR UNIVERSITY
?
THINKING OF THE WORLD
r.