S
DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD ON MONDAY,
?
APRIL 6, 1992 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 7:00 P.M.
.
OPEN SESSION
Present:
?
Saywell, W.G., Chair
Barrow, A.
Absent: ?
Bawa, M.
Blackman, R.
Beattie, S.
Blaney, J.
Cercone, N.
Boland, L.
Choquer, K.
Bowman, M.
D'AUIia, J.
Brown, A.
Evenden, L.
Bukovac, S.
Gray, P.
Carlson, R.
Leiss, W.
Covell, M.
Menzies, R.
Dill, L.
Morrison, T.
Dobb,T.
Etherington, L.
Nielsen, V.
Gee, E.
Saunders, A.
Giffen, K.
Soheili, A.
Haje,P.
Swartz, N.
Heinrich, K.
Toohey, K.
Hoegg, J.L.
Warsh, M.
Hotter, A.
Winne, P.
Jones, C.
Wotherspoon, A.
Lim, K.
Luk, W.S.
Marteniuk, R.
Mauser, G.
McKeown, B.
In attendance:
Munro, J.
?
-Jkl,I.
A. Barton
Northcott, P.
J. Nance
Palmer, E.
S. Montgomery
Palmer, L.
Percival, P.
Pint ield, L.
Rae, B.
Reilly, N.
Rieckhoft, K.
Shannon, D.
Shapiro, S.
Smith, S.
Stewart, M.L.
Thomson, K.
Verdun-Jones, S.
Wade, S.
Walker, R.
Heath, W.R., Secretary
Grant, B., Recording Secretary
S
S.M. 06/04/92
Page 2
1.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
The Agenda was approved as distributed.
2.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OPEN SESSION OF MARCH 2. 1992
The Minutes were approved as distributed.
Ec.
i)
Referring to the motion at the bottom of page 3 with respect to FTE
enrolment targets, Senate was advised that it is now believed that SFU's Access
enrolment target will increase by 200 rather than the originally anticipated 500
FTEs which will result in a target of minus 170 FTEs for 1992-93.
ii)
Reference was made to Item 6 (ii) under Other Business on Page 7, and
in response to an inquiry about the name of the Chair of the Senate Committee
on International Students, Senate was advised that the Vice-President, Academic
had designated S. Shapiro. An objection to this appointment was ruled out of
order by the Chair.
iii)
In response to an inquiry about information pertaining to degree
completion times for students in the Engineering Science program, it was noted
that this information had been provided to Senate at its last meeting.
;1.it.1IL1I;
i)
AppointmentsOn
behalf of Senate,
?
the Chair extended congratulations for the following
0
appointments: E. Gee, Acting Dean of Graduate Studies until the end of August
1992; A. Barrow, Dean of the Faculty of Education; and K. Heinrich who has
been appointed to the governing council of the University of Northern B.C.
ii)
Elections - Paper S.92-29
Senate's attention was drawn to paper S.92-29 which was distributed prior
to the meeting for information with respect to the results of recent elections to
Senate and the Board of Governors.
iii)
Budget
Senate was advised that the basic thrust of the budget was no surprise
and in fact the University had been planning for a difficult budget. However the
University had not anticipated such a reduction on the revenue side. The Chair
explained that close to two million dollars had been lost over what had been
expected due to such things as a major reduction in the University's equipment
budget, a freeze on tuition fees which included all students except foreign
students, and a significant reduction in Access Program funding at both the
undergraduate and graduate levels. When all of these things are taken into
consideration along with increases in obligatory costs such UIC payments, CPP
payments, utility increases, negotiated agreements relating to pension plan,
TSSU workload and the traditional progression through the ranks for faculty and
administrative personnel, it is expected that the University will have to deal with a
S.M. 06/04/92
Page 3
projected deficit of approximately four million dollars. Provincial law does not
. permit universities to run a deficit so efforts must be made to reduce the
University's total expenditure. This was the reason for the communication
recently sent to the university community announcing a freeze on all
appointments. In addition, consultations are underway with the Deans and
Chairs of Departments to seek their advice, and a meeting between the President
and the Senate Committee on University Budget has been scheduled. It is
hoped that a budget will be available to present to the Board of Governors at its
next meeting.
At the request of the Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards and
Bursaries, R. Blackman, as Chair was asked to bring to Senate's attention the
Committee's concern about the budget for scholarships and awards. Senate had
no objection to A. Blackman's request to present the following statement from the
Committee to Senate for consideration:
"This Committee urges the administration to give financial aid and
awards the highest priority when establishing the 92-93 operating
budget. We recognize that all components in the university budget
are vulnerable in this time of financial exigency however we feel it is
particularly important to protect those components that serve to
reward the very best students and to support those most in need."
Senate was invited to show its support for the statement and responded by
enthusiastic clapping on the table.
• In response to an inquiry to the Vice-President Academic as to what his priorities
will be in arriving at the distribution of funds under his control, J. Munro advised
that in a period of serious financial restraints his overriding priorities are not to
damage the programs of students, particularly undergraduate students that are
pursuing degrees, and not to damage the excellence in research that the
University has achieved over the years.
a)
The following are the results of elections to the Senate Committee on
Instructional Methods and Organization (SCIMO):
Four Faculty members elected by Senate for no specified term of office.
Candidates: L. Boland, P. Coleman, C. Day, M. Dubiel, N. Dyck, J. Jones, J.
Ogloff, L. Palmer, G. Poole, G. Strate, L. Weldon.
Elected:
?
Peter Coleman, Leigh Palmer, Gary Poole, Grant Strate
One Undergraduate Student
elected by Senate for no specified term of office.
Candidates: Z. Barabas, J. Laidley
Initial balloting resulted in a tie vote; second balloting was required.
Elected: ?
Zoltan Barabas
S.M. 06/04/92
Page 4
One Graduate Student
elected by Senate for no specified term of office.
Candidates: V.R. Black, K. Giffen ?
0
Elected: ?
Ken Giffen
In reply to a concern that all members of the Committee are male, the Chair
indicated that he had deliberately reserved naming one of the two presidential
appointments to the committee until after the election in case a balance issue
arose. He advised that he would take these concerns into consideration when
making the appointment.
MIEL
-g-
11 1 1MQ0
=11 11 ?
If.1s,1.sIli(!:
Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors as set forth in S.92-24, the change in degree
requirements for the Master of Resource Management to allow
students to take either MRM 642 or MRM 644 rather than
requiring MRM 642 alone"
Question was called, and a vote taken. ?
MOTION CARRIED
ii) ?
Paper S.92-25 - Department of Psychology - Experimental Psychology
Program - Change in M.A. degree requirements
Moved by J. Munro, seconded by R. Blackman
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors as set forth in S.92-25 the changes in the M.A. degree
requirements in the Experimental Psychology Program"
It was noted that the credit hours for a large number of courses had increased
and concerns were expressed that this would result in budgetary implications and
increase the cost of the program. Senate was advised that not all of the courses
are given every year; in fact some of them are offered quite infrequently, and the
increased faculty teaching load represented by this change will be significantly
less than the equivalent of one additional faculty load per year. In response to an
inquiry as to whether the faculty resources might not be better employed at the
undergraduate level where courses are over-subscribed, it was noted that the
Psychology Department already teaches a large proportion of the undergraduate
student population and the Department felt the graduate program needed more
attention. Senate was also advised that although the Psychology Department is
making a relatively minor shift in teaching distribution to favour the graduate
program, the Department feels confident that they will be able to continue to
S.M. 06/04/92
Page 5
serve the undergraduate student population well and without any great increase
in sessional instructors. Bnef discussion followed.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
3 ?
!i1uF W1If.ji sli ?
i1i11T]
Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
"that Senate approve and recommend to the Board of Governors
the proposed agreements with the University College of the Fraser
Valley dated 26 February 1992 covering:
• Selection, Recruitment and Assignment of Faculty;
• Curriculum Development, Grading and Evaluation
• Program Administration and Monitoring"
In response to an inquiry concerning the impact of this arrangement on the
Library resources, it was noted that inter-library loans service would have to be
provided and expectations are that students from the University College of the
Fraser Valley would make some use of SFU's library resources. However, it was
pointed out that the Provincial Government has provided a grant to cover the cost
• of the partnership agreement and some of that grant will be allocated to the
Library. It is anticipated that program proposals will be presented to Senate at its
next meeting and further details will be available at that time.
Reference was made with respect to the first two sentences in point #2 on page
one. Opinion was expressed that these two sentences appeared to be in conflict
with one another and request for clarification was made. It was noted that two
stages are identified in the process; the first one is that SFU departments will
review vitae, the second is that a joint committee will also participate in the
review process but Senate's attention was drawn to point six on page 2 which
specifies that final approval on the assignment of existing and new faculty to
teach upper level courses rests with the University. It is the University's
understanding that the joint committee would not be able to overrule a
Department if a Department should find a candidate unsuitable. It was also
pointed out that approval on the assignment of faculty to teach upper
,
level
courses at UCFC would be done initially and would continue indefinitely unless
some problem developed.
Question was called, and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
ii)
?
Paper S.92-27 - Department of Archaeology - External Review (For
Information)
J. Nance, Chair of the Department of Archaeology, S. Montgomery,
Undergraduate Archaeology Student Representative, and A. Barton, Graduate
S.M. 06/04/92
Page 6
Student Archaeology Representative were in attendance in order to respond to
questions.
Reference
?
was made to the comments of the reviewers with respect to
0
inadequate resources and opinion was expressed that this is a recurrent theme in
all of the external reviews presented to Senate and that Senate itself must bear
some of the responsibility for this situation.
Concern was expressed about the issue of gender bias toward female students
in the Department which was commented upon in the report and discussion
turned to this issue. Senate was advised that the University Harrassment Officer
had been invited to address this issue with faculty members in the Department
and all members of the Department are now aware and sensitive to this issue. It
was acknowledged by the undergraduate students that the Department had
taken their concerns seriously and was taking steps to prevent any further difficult
situations from occurring.
Discussion turned briefly to the issue of sessional instructors. In response to an
inquiry about student complaints about grading by sessional instructors, Senate
was advised that guidelines for TAs and Sessional Instructors establishing
standards and procedures for course structure and grading are under
preparation.
Senate's attention was drawn to the concerns of the undergraduate students with
regard to the Archaeology Field School and it was pointed out that the
Department is in the process of drafting guidelines for participation in the Field
School and it was noted that the Department has been very responsive in
addressing the concerns of the students in this regard.
Further information was requested with reference to points 19, 23 and 25 on
pages 3 and 4 of the report which dealt with course offerings and completion
times. In response, Senate was informed that the Department felt the report was
somewhat inaccurate in their assessment in this area. It was felt that the variety
and diversity of courses was at issue rather than the number of courses offered;
and it was explained that the number of faculty in the department, particularly in
the area of physical anthropology, accounts, in part, for the lack of variety in
courses. However, an additional faculty member will be added and hopefully the
variety of courses will be increased.
d) ?
Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules
i)
?
Paper S.92-28 - Responsibilities and Terms of Appointment of Faculty
Deans
Moved by J. Munro, seconded by S. Wade
"that Senate approve and recommend approval to the Board of
Governors, as set out in S.92-28, the Responsibilities and Terms of
Appointment of Faculty Deans"
S.M. 06/04/92
Page 7
.
?
Senate was advised that the revisions essentially update documents approved in
1970 in order to reflect the current role of Deans.
Question was called and a vote taken.
?
MOTION CARRIED
6.
?
Other Business
Concern was expressed about the gender specific language contained in the
University Act, and inquiry was made as to why the language had not been
changed. It was pointed out that the University Act is the responsibility of the
Provincial Government .
_
flthS
gtuU4tIH
uuuti_W.*flt.
The following notice of motion was received from K. Rieckhoff:
"that Senate establish regulations which will ensure that no new
or revised courses and programs, or offerings of existing
courses and programs at new locations, including individual
offerings of special topics courses, can be offered unless
adequate library resources are in place, or funds for them
guaranteed in the base budget of the Library"
8.
?
Information
The date of the next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, May 11,
1992.
The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 8:10 p.m.
W.R. Heath
Secretary of Senate
0