1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10
    11. Page 11
    12. Page 12
    13. Page 13
    14. Page 14
    15. Page 15
    16. Page 16
    17. Page 17
    18. Page 18
    19. Page 19
    20. Page 20
    21. Page 21
    22. Page 22
    23. Page 23
    24. Page 24
    25. Page 25
    26. Page 26
    27. Page 27
    28. Page 28
    29. Page 29
    30. Page 30
    31. Page 31
    32. Page 32
    33. Page 33
    34. Page 34
    35. Page 35

 
t ?
to
?
SiMON FRASER UNIVERSITY
?
tS.4-4q
MEMORANDUM
lo
............................
Evans,
?
..From ....... ...........
.
.
D.H..Sul.1.ivan.,..D..a.n
Secretary of Senate
.
.
?
. ?
Faculty
of
Arts .
Subject
................. ?
Date...................
No.vemb.e.....1.9
........
1.9.7.0 ................... ..............
The Faculty of Arts has approved the new courses in
the attached submissions to be recommended for inclusion in the
1971-72 Undergraduate Calendar.
GEOGRAPHY 001 The Geography of Technocratic Society
FRENCH 110 Reading French I
FRENCH lii Reading French II
FRENCH
305
French Stylistics
FRENCH
420
French Semantics and Lexicology
FRENCH
421
Varieties of French
FRENCH
460
Introduction to Medieval & Renaissance Texts
FRENCH
480
Seminar I
FRENCH
481
Seminar II
SPANISH
140
Hispanic Culture
Would you please place this on the agenda of the next
meeting of Senate for its approval.
?
Thank you.
DHS: e
end.

 
o.
FACULTY
OF ARTS
November, 1969
NEW COURSE PRCPOSAL
1. CALENDAR INFORMATION
Department: GEOGRAPHY ?
Course Number: 001
?
Title:
Sub-title or Description:
A geographic view of the human and environmental costs and
benefits of a technology which enables man to challenge, adapt,
and threaten the ecosystem.
Credit Hours: 3
?
Vector Description: 2-1-0
Pre-requisite(s):
None
The Ccoraph'j of
Thnccr.ii -ic -
2.
ENROLMENT AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 200
Semester Offered (e.g. yearly, dvery Spring; twice yearly, Fall
and Spring)
Yearly
When will course first be offered?
8 months after approval by Senate, thus either Fall 1971 or Spring 1972.
3. JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar courses
in the same department, and from courses in other departments
in the University?
At present no course takes a holistic view of the growth of
technology and the environmental crisis in our society. Ecologists
tend to neglect the societal changes implicit in their "ecosystem
notion".
-
see attached.
B.
What is the range of topics that may b- dealt with in the
course?
S
?
- :ce attached.
.

 
I ?
I
2.
C.
flow does this
COUiSO
fit the goals of the department?
Geography is concerned with, among other things , the relationship between
man and his environment, both cultural and physical. This Department, in
its programmes, is concerned with all aspects of this relationshi p
. To
date however, it has not been possible to present a course of this nature,
particularly one designed primarily for non-geography majors. Only recently
has a large amount of information become available about the impact between
societal chance and environmental crises.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
None
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
Insertion of a statement that Geography 001 cannot be
taken as part
of
the Geography major/honors program.
.
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar if
this course is approved?
None.
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Considerable questioning of the illusion of the benefits of continuing
technologic change and its feedback to the environment (i.e., pollution)
seems to exist amongst all students.
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
To examine the human and environmental costs and benefits of a
growing technological and scientific system.
0

 
I ?
I
S.
?
3.
4• BUDGETARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be aviiah1e to teach this Course?
N.E. Eliot Hurst
R.B. Horsfall
B.
What
for this
are the
Course?
special space and/or equipment requirements
None.
C.
Any other
budgetary implications of mounting
this
course:
None.
S
LI
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean
of
Faculty:
Senate:
S

 
- (.eordphy
001
a1e 1e'st
SU((';F}I) ?
RLI) I'1XL'
1.
V.C. FerRis:;, Technological Men: ti
,
ti i
M
yth and the Reality, Mentor, 1060,
c.
2.
P. Goodman, The Morel Ambiguity of America, C.D.C. Publications, 1066,
c.
$1.25.
3.
E.J. Mishan, The Costs of Economic Growth, Penguin, 1060, c. $1.25.
L.
T. Roszok, The Making of
?
Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic
Society, Doubleday, 1069, c.
SUGGESTED RECN1ENDED TEXTS:
1. R. Dubois, Reason Awake: Science for Man, Columbia University Press,
1970.
2. G. de Bell (e
• 3. J. Ellul, The
4.
J.G. Mitchell
5.
P. Shephard
an
d.), The Environmental Handbook, Ballantine, 1970.
Technological Society, Vint'ange 1964.
C.L. Stallings (ed.), Ecotactics, Simon and Schuster, 1970.
D. McKinley (eds.), The Subversive Science: Essays Towards
Ecology of Man, Houghton Mifflin, .1969.
COURSE OUTLINE:
1.
Introduction. An ecological perspective on the effects of scientific
thought and technology on the man-environment relationship.
Particular stress will be placed on the social and psychic costs
peculiar to the human component of the ecosystem.
2.
The Historical Roots of the Technolocica1 Thrust. Trace via C.J. Singer,
A History of Technology, 0.U.1 1
., 1958; Lynn White, The Ex
p ansion of
Technolcey, Walker, 1970; and H. Kranuberg and C.W. Pursell,
Techno].oc'
y
in Western Civilisation, 0.U.P., 1968. Contrast the
philosophies of Rena Dubois (Reason Awake, Columbia U.P.. 1970) or
Nigel Calder (Technopolis, MacGibbon and Kee, 1060) with Paul
Goodman (The Moral Ambiguity of America, C.B.C., 1966) or L. Murnford,
L.C. Eislcy, etc.
3.
The Machine and its Critic'.;. An exe -ii r.at
i
on of present day industrial
society; the gradual change in technolocy, social forms and
cultural
W ?
norms. The role of "romantic conservationists", "moderate cor.scr-
vationists", "liberals",
'ir:-:ists',
and "romantic revolutionists",
the acceptance and santificetion of "economic growth" and
"progress"
(viz.
E.J. Mihn, The Co;ts oFEconomic (rowth, Pelican, 1067).

 
Eliot Ilur;; t.
?
Goi'hy ?
001
?
2.
4. ?
Th(' ?
CT'
i r;i:.
?
Source:; of
the
h )tOriCal
(1CVe1Op1n'nt
of the
*
C1 1 1:
;1s
I
nc.Ludb 1ym While (in hep trd and McKinley), Clarence
Glackcii (Trac(!s on the Rhiodi.::
Shore, U. of C. Pre.-.-s, 1057) Yi }'u
Tuun, etc. Continuing with au analysis of the role of political
institutions and politicians in shaping the direction and solution
of the crisis; an examination of the uses and abuses of the current
concern for "ecology"; the feedback to the technologic system.
5. The Pro
p
hets of the flew. Mankind, the prophets say, is on the threshold
of a new age, with new powers over man and environment, which will
radically transform the whole character and meaning of human
existence. The prophets include a "sociological group" like Ellul,
Marshall, McLuhun, Gross, Etzioni and other futurists, and an
"existential" group like Skinner, Clarke, and Teilhard de Chard-;.n.
Particular emphasis will be placed on the philosophy of Teilbard and
its critics.
6. The Technological Revolution. The historical growth of techno!o,', the
conceot of an "industrial man" and its subsequent transformation to
"technologic man", the effects on the environment and the ecological
crusade, and the various "utopia" are now examined in the light of
current counter proposals - viz. Roszak's, The Making of a Counter
Culture, Muller's, The Children of' Franke ins tein, Leo arx's, The
Machine in the Garden and Fromin's, The Revolution of Hope.
7. A Guide to Contemporary Reality. With these technoloic and anti-technologic
philosphies in mind, we can view the contrasting mdels that are
erected
of:-
(1) imperialism
(ii) economic apartheid
(iii)
the military industrial complex,
(iv)
earth resources
(v) the conservation ethic
(vi) education
(vii)
urban living
(viii) environmental quality.
8. CQnclusiofl - Survival in the Global Villace. An assessment of the
prospects of survival in the light of the technologic crisis, the
concept of the ecosystem, and the aim towards some common human
welfare.
0

 
FACULTY ?
ARTS ?
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INFORIATION
Department:
D.M.L.
Fren1i...
?
Course Number:
F.
110 ?
Title:
Reading
French I
Sub—title or Description:
Acquisition of general reading facility in French. Open to all students.
Does not count towards the DML requirements for French Majors and Honors.
Credit Hours: 3
?
Vector Description: 1-2-0
Pre-requisite(s):
None
.
II ENOLMENT AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 60
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fall and Spring
Any semester, upon request.
When course will first be offered:
If possible, Fall 1971.
III JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar
courses in the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
A course designed aservice to the University at large. Will provide
students with a means of fulfilling graduate program language requirement.
B.
What is the range of topics that m7 be dAalt with in
the course?
Reading skills and techniques applied to the comprehension of French texts.

 
O-2-
C.
How
does this course fit the goals of the department?
Similar reading courses are offered in the department for German, Spanish
and Russian.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
Will not count towards the DML requirements for French Majors and Honors.
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
None
.
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
None
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Very strong demand (Cf. reasons under A).
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
To improve the registration in the DML and to be a service to the
University at large.

 
S
?
-3-
Iv BUDL'rARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be availab.. to teach this course?
Three faculty members are available to teach the courses.
B.
What are the special space and/or equipment requirements
for titia course?
Regular classroom.
C.
Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
5 ?
No.
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
0

 
FACULTY . ARTS
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INFU1ATION
Department: D.M.L. French ?
Course Number: F. 111
?
Title: Reading
French II
Sub-title or Description:
Continuation of F110-3 with emphasis on specialized vocabularies and trans-
lation techniques.
Credit Hours:
3 ?
Vector Description: 1-2-0
Pre-requisite(s): F. 110-3 or special permission of the course chairman.
II ENROLMENT AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 60
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fail and Spring):
Any semester, upon request
When course
will
first be offered: 1972
III JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar
courses In the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
A course designed as
a
service to the University at large. Will provide
students with a mean
of
fulfilling graduate program language requirements.
.
B.
What Is the range of topics that m*y' be dealt with in
the course?
Translation
techniques and study of specialized vocabularies.
.

 
• ?
-2-
C.
How does this course fit the goals of the department?
Similar reading courses are offered in the department for German, Spanish
and Russian.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
Will not count towards the D.M.L. requirements for French Majors and Honors.
E.
What are the calendar changes
necessary
to reflect the
addition of this course?
None
.
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
None
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Very strong demand from other departments in the Faculty of Arts and the
Faculty of Science.
H.
Other reasons for introducing
the course.

 
S
?
-3-
IV BUDTARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
Three faculty members are available to teach this course.
B.
What are the special space and/or equipment requirements
for thia course?
Regular classroom
C.
Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
is ?
No
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
C

 
FACULTY OF ARTS
?
MEK
COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR
INF.i1ATION
Department:
D.M.L. Frenck. ?
Course
Number:F. 305_
Title:
French
Sub-title or Description:
?
Stylistics.
Introduction to the application of basic linguistic concepts to the study
of French Literature,
Credit Hours: 3
?
Vector Description: 1-2-0
Pre-requisite(s):
F. 301-3
II ENROLNEWf AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 30
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fall and Spring):
Fall or Spring on a rotative basis.
When course
will
first be offered: 1972.
III JUSTIFICATION
A. What Is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar
courses in the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
This course, without parallels in French lower level courses, or in other
departments, will serve as an introduction to 400-level courses in French
Linguistics and Literature. It aims at the analysis of literary texts
from the point of view of modern linguistic techniques.
B. What is the range of topics that my be da1t with in
the course?
Problems in Discourse Analysis (theories of content and expression, lexical
and semantic organization, context of situation, collocations,etc ... )

 
O-2-
C.
How does this course fit the goals of the department?
The purpose of this course is to eliminate the possible cleavage of
Linguistics and Literature and to show the interrelation (even inter-
dependance) between the two disciplines.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
Will simply count towards the 30/50 upper level credit hours for the
B.A. degree.
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
None.
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
None.
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Since students are currently unaware of such an interrelation between
Linguistics and Literature, this course has been proposed by Faculty
to fill the gap.
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
Such a course, given as an introduction to Linguistics and Literatures
might well provoke curiosity and interest in both fields.

 
SIV BUD(E'PARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
Three faculty members are now available to teach the course.
B. What are the special space and/or equipment requirements
for this course?
None.
C.
Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
None.
C
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
0

 
FACULTY OF ARTS?
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INFCJ IATION
Department:
DML French
?
Course Number: F. 420
?
Title:
French
Semantics and
Sub-title or Description: ?
Lexicology.
Study of diachronic and synchronic organization of semantic and
lexical fields. Formation and evolution of French Vocabulary.
Credit Hours: 3
?
Vector Description: ?
0-3-0
Pro-requisite(s):
(Same prerequisites as for the whole 400-level series in French Linguistics,
i.e. F. 301-3 and L.
221-3 -
These general prerequisites will appear under
the title: French Linguistics.)
II ENROLTh1r AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 20
Semester
Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fall and Spring):
Fall, every two years: on a rotative basis.
When course will
first be offered: 1972.
III JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is
'
the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from
similar
courses in
the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
This course will fill an important gap in the study of French at the
400-level, complttnenting the coursejin phonology and grammar.
B.
What is the range of topics that ma7 be dealt with
in
the course?
Evolution, description and organization of vocabulary.
.

 
O
-2-
C.
How does this course fit the goals of the department?
This course is felt to be necessary to give students a well-rounded
knowledge of French. It also provides a bridge between undergraduate
and graduate studies.
D. How does this course affect degree requirements?
Will simply count towards the 30/50 upper level credit hours for the
B.A. degree.
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
None.
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
None.
G.
What Is the nature of student demand for this course?
Strong demand (See reasonsunder A and Q.
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
To offer students a wider choice of Linguistics courses related to French.
0

 
IV RUDGL1ARY
AND
SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
At the present time,
2 faculty members are available to teach
this
course. This number may increase when the vacancies in French
Linguistics are filled.
B.
What are the special space and/or equipment requirements
for
this
course?
None
C. Any
other
budgetary implications of mounting
this course:
None
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
1^1

 
.
FACULTY OF ARTS?
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INF1iATION
Department: D.M.L. French ?
Course Number: F. 421
?
Title:
Varieties
Sub-title or Description:
?
-of French.
Studies in French Dialectology and varieties of French in the French
speaking world.
Credit Hours:
?
3 ?
Vector Description: 0-3-0
Pro-requisite(s):
(Same prerequisites as for the whole 400-level series in French Linguistics,
i.e. F.
301-3
and
(221-3).
These general prerequisites will appear under the
title: French Linguistics.
. ?
11 ENROLMwr
AND 0UHLVUL1.flU
Estimated Enrolment: 20
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fall and Spring):
Spring semester every 2 years on a rotative basis.
When course will first
be offered:
Spring
1972.
III JUSTIFICATION
A. What is the detailed description of
the
course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar
courses in the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
Dialectology and language varieties represent an important field of
French studies heretofore undeveloped in the department.
Such a course would allow the student to become more familiar with viable
alternatives
as standards of spoken French.
40
?
B. What is
the range of topics that may be dealt with in
the course?
Characterisation of standard French, French Dialects, Varieties of French
in the French speaking world,
?
&i.'

 
C. How does
this course fit the goals of the department?
The purpose of this course is to give the student a broader knowledge
of French.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
Will simply count towards the 30/50 upper level credit hours for the
B.A. degree.
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
None
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
None
CL What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Strong demand from students because, besides their knowledge of Standard
French, they are interested also
in varieties
of French
.
H. Other reasons for introducing the course.

 
. ?
-3-
flT
BUD(ARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
Two faculty members available :ight now to teach this course. This
number may increase as soon as the vacancies in French Linguistics
are filled.
B.
What are the
scial
space and/or equipment requirements
for this course?
Use of the labs, a tape recorder (+ tapes) and some records in varieties
of French.
C.
Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
40
None.
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
S

 
.
FACULTY OF ARTS?
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INFJIATION
Department: Modern Languages
?
Course Number:
.
460 ?
Title:MedieVal and
(french Division) ?
Renaissance
1tuatura
Sub-title or Description: (None, the title being explicit in itself.)
Credit Hours: 4
?
Vector Description: 1-3-0
Pre-requisite(s): Only pre-requisites applying to the
400
series as a whole,
i.e. French 240, 241. Students are advised to take
#403
and
#404
prior to this course.
II ENROLMENT AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 20
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fall and Spring):
This course will be offered in Fall Semester on a two years rotative basis.
When course will first be offered: 1971 - 1972
III JUSTIFICATION
A. What is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation
from
lower level courses, from similar
courses in the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
The course will deal with a period in French literature which
was
not covered at all in the programme. Texts from the Middle Ages and the
Renaissance
are
not used in lower level courses because of their language
difficulties. At the 400 level, F.
460
will be of special interest to
students both in Linguistics and Literature as an illustration of French
403 and
404
(History of French).
B. What is the range of topics that rny be dAa1.t with in
• ?
the course?
Literary texts of Old and Middle French from "la vie do St Alexis",
"la
chanson
do
Roland", "le Roman de la Rose" to Villon, du Bellay,
Rosard etc....

 
-2-
C.
How does this course fit the goals of the department?
This course is a step forward toward more collaboration between the
fields of French linguistics and French literature; it takes advantage
of the original concept of the Dept. of Modern Languages which had
brought people in linguistics and literature together.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
French 460 will count towards the
30/50
upper level credit hours for
the B.A. degree.
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
addition of the course
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
none
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
great demand. (cf. reason under A and C.)
D.M.L. students need F.
460
as a necessary complement to 403 and 404.
History and English majors
with a
special interest in the Middle Ages
would
find the course very useful.
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
The purpose of this new course is to offer to students a larger selection
of courses. Furthermore, this course is an indispensable part of an
• ?
adequate preparation for students who plan to enter a graduate programme
in French.

 
-3-
flT
BUDGETARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A. Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
Three Faculty members are willing to teach this course and one of them
is
a
specialist of that period.
13. What are the special space and/or equipment requirements
for this course?
No
special
space and equipment requirements. This course requires
Just a regular classroom for 20 students.
C. Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
none.
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
C
0

 
Q
Introduction to 'ledieval and renaissance Texts
Course: French Literature 460-4
The
Middle Ages and the Renaissance
proposed course chairman: D. ilson (Assistant
Professor)
Suggested Required Texts:
La Chanson de Roland, F. Whitehead, ed., Blackwells, 1962.
Beroul, The Romance of Tristan, A. Ewert, ed., Blackwella, 1958.
La Farce de Maistre Pathelin, Petits Classiques Bordas.
Thâtre religleux au Moyen Age, Classiques Larousse.
Villon, Oeuvres potigues, Garnier-Flammarion.
French Poetry of the Renaissance, Bernard Weinberg, ed., N.Y., 1954.
Rabelais, Gargantua, Bibliotheque de Cluny.
Pantagruel,
Montaigne, Essais, Collection du Flambeau.
Outline:
1.
General - The course is intended to fill .the program's present gap by a study
• ?
of some of the major texts from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. The texts
are chosen to emphasize the various genres and to give some idea of these in
their earliest forms in French literature. Stress on the aspects of continuity
O ?
between the two periods as well as a definition of the more traditional points
of contrast between them, e.g. that between a period of faith and the humanism
of the Renaissance. Both Villon and Rabelais will be seen as transitional
figures. It Is recommended, but not required that the student have taken
French 403-404.
2.
Initially a discussion of the double perspectives of French literature In its
origins, using the epic (Chanson de Roland) and the romance (Tristan) as focal
points. Especially important will be the concepts
of
heroism and courtly love
as forms of self-realization on a social and esthetic plane. Situation of works
in their historical context although the principal stress will be on their
literary value, particularly the structure and function of the rcit Romance
seen as precurseur of the novel.
3.
The second stage will deal briefly with the origins of the theater in France,
both comic and serious. Character of the religious theater and its evolution
up to the 15th century: moraiit, yre, miracle. Some consideration of the
techniques of presentation, dcor, jeu scniq, etc. Secular theater illus-
trated by Pathelin, with a discussion of the popular literature of the period
and the various audience levels to which literature in the Middle Ages appealed.
- ?
4. ?
Finally, for the Middle Ages, a discussion of lyric poetry. Reference to the
• ?
arts potigues of the period to explain the early esthetic of poetry in France.
The works of Villon to illustrate major themes of poetic
expression throughout
the period.

 
a
a
?
2.
5. The Renaissance viewed from the standpoints of poetry (emphasis on the Pliade)
and prose (Rabelais and Montaigne). Brief discussion of the major intellectual
currents: humanism, p1atoism, etc. Rabelais to be seen as a transitional
figure, Montaigne more as pointing to the free-thinking trends of the 17th and
lCth centuries. Stress on the conic world-view of Rabelais, the introspective
method of Montaigne. The esthetic of the Pliade considered in contrast with
the poetics of the Middle Ages, showing the evolution in the use of language as
an expressive device. Question of hermetic poetry in the 16th century: Maurice
Scve. Brief discussion of the idea of the baroque as the final poetic stage
of the period.
6.
The course will require an oral report and a paper plus a one hour written exam.
It is hoped that the first two still allow the individual student to study in
depth at least one work not among those on the reading list, which is neces-
sarily selective. Most of the necessary critical apparatus will be provided
by the texts chosen.
0

 
.
FACULTY OF ARTS
?
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR IMFORHATION
Department: Modern Languages ?
Course Number: F. 480
?
Title: Seminar I
(French Division)
Sub-title or Description:
Study in more depth of an
area
covered by a French Literature course of the
400 series.
Credit Hours: 2
?
Vector Description: none
Pre—requisite(s):
By permission of course Chairmen only.
II ENROLMENT AND SCHEDULING
0 ?
Estimated Enrolment: 10
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fail and Spring):
Any semester, upon sufficient student demand, on a rotative basis with F. 481-2
When course will first be offered:
Fall 1971
III JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar
courses in the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
This seminar is intended for Majors and Honors who wish to complement
a 400 level Literature course with more readings, more discussions or
more research and written work. The genre courses, only 3 hours per
week, do not allow the students with a special interest in the area to
explore the subject with enough depth. Similar types of seminar courses are
offered in French Linguistics, English and History.
B.
What is the range of topics that may' be d'a].t with
in
• ?
the course?
Any subject already presented in the 400 level French Literature courses -
But more detailed study.

 
-2-
. ?
C. How does this course fit the goals of the department?
Allow the students in French Literature to prepare a more in
depth programme.
D. Raw
does this course affect degree requirements?
Will count towards the
30/50
upper level credit hours for the B.A.
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
Addition of a new course.
C
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
none.
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Strong demand (Cf. reasons under A and C)
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
The Department wishes to give its students as much flexibility as pos-
sible. In the 400 level courseseries, they now have the choice between
a survey or a study in more depth.

 
I
S
IV BUDARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A. Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
Three Faculty members are available to supervise this seminar.
B. What are the scia
l
l space and/or equipment requirements
for this course?
none.
C. Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
none.
S
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
0

 
I
FACULTY OF ARTS
NEW COURSE PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INFliATION
Department: Modern Languages
?
Course Number: F. ii
?
Title: Seminar II
(French Division)
Sub-title or Description:
Alternate course with F. 40. Study in more depth of an area covered
by a French Literature course of the 400 series.
Credit Hours:
2 ?
Vector Description: none
Pre-requisite(s):
By permission of Course Chairman only.
II ENROLMENT AND SCHEDULING
Estimated Enrolment: 10
Semester Offered (e.g. Yearly, every Spring; twice yearly,
Fall and Spring):
Any semester upon sufficient student demand on a rotative basis with
F. 40-2
When course
will
first be offered:
Spring 1972
III JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is the detailed description of the course including
differentiation from lower level courses, from similar
courses In the same department and from courses in other
departments in the University?
This seminar Is intended for Majors and Homors who wish to complement
a 400 level Literature course with more readings, more discussions or
more research and written work. The genre courses, only
3
hours per
week, do not allow the students with a special interest in the area to
explore the subject with enough depth. Similar types of seminar courses
are already offered in French Linguistics, English and History.
is
?
B. What is the range of topics that rn*y be da1t with in
the course?
Any subject already presented In the 400 level French Literature courses-
But more detailed study

 
I
• ?
-2-
C.
How does this course fit the goals of the department?
Allow the students in French Literature to prepare a more in depth
programme.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
Will
count
towards the
30/50
upper level credit hours for the R.A.
E.
what are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
Addition of a new course.
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
none.
G. 'What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Strong demand (cf. reasons under A and C)
H.
Other reasons for introducing the course.
The Department wishes to give its students as much flexibility as pos-
sible. In the 400
level
course series, they now have the choice between
a survey or a study in more depth.

 
1
?
4
—3-
.
?
IV BUDGETARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
Three Faculty members are available to supervise this
seminar.
B.
What are the special space and/or equipment requirements
for this course?
none.
C.
Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
none.
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
0

 
f
S
FACULTY OF ARTS
Ni COMM PROPOSAL
I CALENDAR INATIC
Department: of Modern Languages ?
Course Number: -S. 10
S anjs Division
Sub-title or
ecription:
M141 Hi spanic
Cii
ii
r'
The artistic, political and social
heritage
of Spain and LaLin America. A coilr
-^;
e
condqcter 4
in Fnçlis
?
May be
taken
concurrentl
y
with S
p
anis
h
102-201
or inrJcpe.nd-
ently.
Credit Hours: ?
3
?
Vector Description: (2-1-0)
Pre—requleita(s): none
II
ENROLNT AND SCHEDULI1
EstimatedEnrolment:
30
Semester Offered (e.g.
Yearly, every
Spring; twice yearly,
Fall
and
Spring):
40
?
Twice yearly, every Fall and Spring.
When course will
first
be offered:
Fall 1971
III
JUSTIFICATION
A.
What is the
detailed
description of the
course including
differentiation from l
o
ver
level
courses, from
similar
courses in the same department and from courses in other
departments
in the University?
(a)
this course will complement the purely language oriented
courses offered at the
100 and 200 level in the Spanish program.
(b)
will serve as general background to anyone interested in
the different special-
ties of Latin American studies.
(c)
will arouse interest in the above fields before or while
the language skill: air
acquf red.
There is no similar
course
offerer' at present at. the Univer.ity.
B.
the
What
course?
is the
range
of
topics
that my be dealt
with
in
It will
provice
an overall view of the
cultural
scene of
Spain end Latir...trieiic
with particular emphasis on their histor
j
, geography, art., music.
?
iiteratre,
social, economical and political problems, and
topics in
contemporary thought.
0

 
O-2-
C.
How does this course fit the goals of the department?
It will create a bridge betwc.en the oral-aural language courFe er the
literature courses.
D.
How does this course affect degree requirements?
No changes:
it will be an elective course
E.
What are the calendar changes necessary to reflect the
addition of this course?
none
C
F.
What course, if any, is being dropped from the calendar
if this course is approved?
none
G.
What is the nature of student demand for this course?
Students have often expressed the desire to have a greater exposure to th
cultural background of the language they are learning.
H. Other reasons for introducing the course.

 
IV BUDGETARY AND SPACE FACTORS
A.
Which faculty will be available to teach this course?
All members of the Spanish
Division
may teach the course or
contribute to i..
B.
What are the spAcial space arid/or equipment requirements
for this course?
None. Audio visual has a great quantity of slides and records which have
hardly been used until present and would contribute greatly to it.
C.
Any other budgetary implications of mounting this course:
None
Approval:
Curriculum Committee:
Dean of Faculty:
Senate:
.
0

Back to top