DRAFT UNTIL APPROVED BY SENATE
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE SENATE OF SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY HELD
    ?
    ON MONDAY, JUNE
    5,
    1989 KLAUS RIECKHOFF HALL, 4:30 P.M.
    ?
    OPEN SESSION
    Present:
    ?
    Saywell, W.G., Chair
    Addison, G.
    Alderson, E. (replacing R. Brown)
    Bedford, B.
    Blackman, R.
    Blaney, J.
    Clayman, B.
    Cleveland, W.
    D'Auria, J.
    Dawson, S. (replacing J. Tuinman)
    Dickinson, J.
    Dobb, T.
    Freedman, A.
    George, D.
    Giffen, K.
    Gill, J.
    Goodman, D.
    Gray, P.
    Green, C.
    Hendrickson, T.
    Hoegg, J.L.
    Jones, C.
    Kennedy, P.
    Mauser, G.
    Munro, D.
    Nyvik, S.
    Palmer, E.
    Palmer, L.
    Reilly, N.
    Rieckhoff, K.
    Rudrum, A.
    Saunders, R.
    Shapiro, S.
    Strate, G.
    Swartz, N.
    Verdun-Jones,
    Wade, S.
    Warsh, M.
    Heath, W.R., Secretary
    Grant, B., Recording Secretary
    Absent: Barrow, R.
    Calvert, T.
    Carlson, R.
    Cercone, N.
    Cove!!, M.
    Dahl, H.
    Dill, L.
    Djwa, S.
    Falcon, K.
    Evany, G.
    Kazepides, A.C.
    Nielsen, V.
    Partridge, J.
    Pinfie!d, L.
    Rae, B.
    Salter, L.
    Shannon, D.
    Tjosvo!d, D.
    Weldon, L.
    Winne, P.
    Wotherspoon, A.
    In attendance: R. Rogow

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 2
    . ?
    The Chair introduced the newly elected and re-elected Senators and, on
    behalf of Senate, welcomed them to the meeting.
    1.
    APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
    The Agenda was approved as distributed.
    2.
    APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OPEN SESSION OF MAY 15. 1989
    Referring to Senate Paper S.89-22 'Undergraduate Admission Targets 1989-3,
    K. Giffen requested that comments he had made during discussion at the last
    meeting be noted in the Minutes. He noted his suggestion that if possible,
    preference be given to hiring existing sessionals when Departments are
    considering hiring new Faculty, and, secondly, that additional resources would
    be allocated for Academic Advice to counsel the increased number of new
    students.
    As a point of clarification, L. Palmer requested the paragraph at the top of
    page 3 to be amended as follows: "...in order for the University to acquire this
    additional funding, the University had to commit itself to increasing
    enrolment by 600 FTEs per year in each of the next six years. In return, full
    funding of $6,500 per FTE would be made available to the University. The
    proposed figure of 3,400 new admissions in 89-3 would complete the FTE
    increase target of 600 for the coming academic year." The Chair indicated
    that the language currently in the Minutes was inaccurate but he did not feel
    the suggested amendment assisted in correcting the inaccuracy. He indicated
    that additional funding is made available with each additional FTE and, in the
    first year of the access program, the University has agreed to increase by an
    additional 600 FTEs. However, figures for the subsequent years have not yet
    been agreed upon. The Chair indicated that he would take this matter under
    advisement and bring back clear language for the next meeting of Senate.
    Following these amendments, the Minutes were approved.
    3. ?
    BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES
    a) ?
    External Review Report 1974 - Department of
    English
    At the request of the Chair, E. Alderson, Acting Dean of Arts informed
    Senate ?
    that ?
    in
    ?
    the ?
    1974 ?
    review
    ?
    process, ?
    the
    three ?
    external ?
    reviewers
    submitted ?
    independent ?
    letters in
    ?
    confidence ?
    to the
    Dean ?
    and
    ?
    Vice-President.
    Those letters were never brought to a point where
    they could be released as
    Senate ?
    documents ?
    and, ?
    in
    ?
    effect, ?
    the ?
    review
    remains
    ?
    an ?
    uncompleted
    administrative action from fifteen years ago.
    ?
    It was
    noted that a copy of this
    review was deposited in the Archives but Senators were not allowed access to
    . ?
    it. ?
    In reply to an inquiry as to what was required so that the report could be
    made available to members of Senate, E. Alderson
    indicated someone would
    have to review the letters and make extracts from
    them and try to recover
    the situation of that time as much as possible in order to prepare a relevant

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 3
    • report. Discussion ensued in which opinions were expressed that the papers
    should be desensitized as much as possible and made available to Senate. The
    Chair indicated that before releasing such a report he would need to
    determine if the external reviewers had been given any assurance of
    confidentiality with regard to their submission or else the University could
    find itself faced with litigation. The Chair advised Senate he would take this
    issue under consideration and report back probably during the Fall semester.
    He also indicated his wish to review the policy issue regarding such reports,
    and that this would also be reported back to Senate.
    b) ?
    Fraser Valley Initiatives
    In reply to an inquiry about the progress of activities in the Fraser
    Valley, the Chair informed Senate that he has been meeting with the
    Presidents of Douglas College, Fraser Valley College and Kwantlen College and
    a draft statement as to what initiatives should be looked at is in preparation.
    A detailed, sophisticated, demographic study is currently underway and
    should be available by the end of June, an Ad Hoc Committee is currently
    studying various models and concepts of satellite campuses and all of these
    studies should come together by the end of summer at which point the
    University would be in a position to make a recommendation to the
    Government as to whether any initiative should be undertaken. If the
    recommendation is positive, the planning process would begin and proceed
    through the normal university channels such as Departments, Faculties,
    Senate Committees, and Senate.
    4. REPORT OF THE CHAIR
    Referring to the tragic situation occurring in China, the Chair expressed
    concern for the future of the students and faculty from the People's Republic
    of China who are studying or working 'at Simon Fraser University on exchange
    programs as well as concern for the students and staff involved in SFU's
    Summer School at Juan University in Changchun. Senate was informed that
    the University had been in contact with the students and their Instructor at
    Juan University and there appeared to be no immediate risk to their safety.
    However, contingency steps have been made to evacuate them as quickly as
    possible if the situation should change. A representative from the President's
    office has been in contact with the families of these students to give them
    whatever assurances we can. The Chair also indicated that he has
    communicated the University's concern over the human tragedy of fellow
    students and academics and others in China and has urged External Affairs to
    take appropriate action to let Canada's voice be heard. He has also urged the
    Government to do everything humanly possible to accommodate any students
    . from the PRC who are in Canada and require visa extensions. It is also
    intended that a joint statement from the three university presidents will be
    consideration.
    sent to Beijing and the language
    ,
    of that statement is currently under

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 4
    K. Rieckhoff wished to share with Senate an appeal he had heard on the
    English language broadcast of Radio Beijing in which listeners, after a brief
    description of the tragic happenings, were asked to share and join in the
    protest of the violation of the civil rights taking place in China.
    Brief discussion followed with regard to the future of the Summer School in
    China, public education events on campus, and the possible financial
    consequences of students seeking political asylum.
    5. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES
    a) SENATE NOMINATING COMMITTEE
    i) ?
    Paper S.89-23 - Elections
    P. Gray indicated that he had submitted nomination by the deadline of
    June 2nd for the Senate Committee on Agenda and Rules, the Senate
    Committee on Continuing Studies, and the Senate Library Committee but
    noted his name did not appear on the Senate paper for election. Following
    determination that his nominations were duly received, elections for those
    three committees would be conducted by mail. Senate recessed for five
    minutes to allow Senators to peruse the Information on Candidates and to
    vote in the remaining elections, the results of which are as follows:
    Senate Committee on Academic Planning (SCAP)/Senate Committee on
    University Budget (SCUB)
    One Student Senator to replace I. Nicol for balance term of office, from date of
    election to September 30, 1989; and one Student Senator to replace J. Shickele
    for balance term of office, from date of election to September 30, 1990.
    Names of candidates: ?
    D. Munro
    S. Wade
    Individual receiving the higher number of votes
    and elected for term of office from date of election
    to September 30, 1990:
    ?
    S. Wade
    Runner-up elected for term of office from date
    of election to September 30, 1989:
    ?
    D. Munro
    SENATE COMMI.ITEE ON CONTINUING STUDIES (SCCS)
    One Student Senator Alternate to replace R. Di Fonzo for balance term of
    office, from date of election to September 30, 1990.
    Elected by acclamation: ?
    J. Gill
    . ?
    SENATE COMMITFEE ON HONORARY DEGREES (SCHD)
    One Senator (at-large) to replace H. Weinberg from date of election for no
    specified term of office.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    S. Djwa

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 5
    SENATE NOMINATING COMMrn'EE (SNQ
    One Senator (at-large) to replace J.L. Berggren for balance term of office, from
    date of election to September 30, 1989.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    A. Rudrum
    One Student Senator to replace R. Maaske for balance term of office, from date
    of election to September 30, 1989.
    Names of candidates: ?
    G. Addison
    K. Giffen
    Individual receiving the higher number of votes
    and declared elected:
    ?
    G. Addison
    SENATE UNDERGRADUATE
    ADMISSIONS BOARD
    (SUAB)
    replace
    September
    ofOne
    ?
    electionStudent
    ?
    R.
    30,
    Dito
    Senator
    Fonzo
    1989.
    September
    to
    for
    replace
    balance
    30,
    ?
    S.
    1989;
    Rashed
    term
    ?
    and
    of
    for
    one
    balance
    office,
    ?
    Student
    ?
    from
    term
    ?
    ?
    Senator
    of
    date
    office,
    ?
    of
    ?
    Alternate
    electionfrom
    date
    ?
    ?
    to
    to
    Names
    of
    candidates:
    ?
    C.
    Green
    T.
    Hendrickson
    D.
    Munro
    • ?
    Individual receiving the highest number of votes and
    elected as Regular member for term of office from
    date of election to September 30, 1989:
    ?
    T.Hendrjckson
    Runner-up elected as Alternate Member for term of
    office from date of election to September 30, 1989:
    ?
    C. Green
    SENATE APPEALS BOARD (SAB)
    One Faculty Senator to replace R.W. Mathewes from date of election for no
    specified term of office.
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    P. Winne
    One Faculty Senator Alternate to replace P. Winne from date of election for no
    specified term of office:
    Elected by acclamation:
    ?
    E. Palmer
    SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES (SCU)
    One Student Senator to replace I. Nicol from date of election for no specified
    term of office.
    Names of candidates: ?
    J. Gill
    T. Hendrickson
    Individual receiving the higher number of votes
    and declared elected:
    ?
    I
    T. Hendrickson

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 6
    .
    ELECTORAL STANDING COMMITTEE (ESC
    One Student Senator to replace S. Rashed from date of election for no specified
    term of office.
    No nominations received:
    ?
    Position Vacant
    b) SENATE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC PLANNING
    i) ?
    Paper S.89-24 - Cariboo College/Simon Fraser University - Bachelor of
    Business' Studies Degree Program
    Moved by R. Saunders, seconded by S. Shapiro
    "that Senate approve and recommend approval to
    the Board of Governors, as set
    forth
    in S.89-24, the
    Cariboo College/Simon Fraser University Bachelor of
    Business Studies Degree Program"
    R. Rogow, the Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Faculty of Business
    Administration was in attendance as a resource person to answer inquiries.
    Reference was made to Item One of the Admission Requirements and inquiry
    made as to what was meant by "or equivalent". R. Rogow advised that this
    wording was adopted from the admission requirements of the University and
    would be treated in the same way. It was noted that SUAB is currently
    considering a definition for the term "or equivalent" with regard to admission
    to the University and it was suggested that the admission requirement in this
    instance should meet with SUAB's definition of the term.
    Reference was made to the concerns expressed by the 'Faculty of Arts
    Curriculum Committee (Appendix I). S. Shapiro explained that this program
    has been initiated in response to the Provincial Government's initiative to
    assist people in the Interior to obtain university degrees in their home
    J
    .
    ?
    sns#
    I
    because they felt
    1
    college initiative am
    Simon Fraser Unive
    year period of time
    is credible and is
    consistent with ti
    relationship with Ca
    is designed to prov
    rather than for pen
    be automatic, and
    UILJ VL1-J UOIJIVbb AMU1111111btf UL l on
    proposeu
    tnis program
    ie University should become involved in the university-
    that this was the best way to do so. He pointed out that
    sity would only be involved with the program for a five-
    He assured Senate that the program offered by Cariboo
    onsistent with the needs of the particular community and
    mission of the university-college program. The
    ibOo is for a limited period of time and the program itself
    le educational opportunities to regions that do have them
    ct transferability.
    ?
    Transfer between institutions will not
    ?
    individuals applying to transfer from Cariboo will be

    'S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 7
    • treated the same way as individuals transferring from any other external
    institution. In reply to concerns as to the quality of these degrees and the
    public's perception of such degrees, S. Shapiro indicated that a different
    degree designation was deliberately used because it is presumed that Cariboo
    will continue to use that designation following its association with Simon
    Fraser University. Although he felt future employers will be able to
    distinguish between the Bachelor of Business. Studies at Cariboo and the
    Bachelor of Business Administration at Simon Fraser University, the more
    general public perception may cause some concern but he felt it would be
    resolved. The Registrar indicated that the diploma will clearly indicate that
    the degree was offered at Cariboo and the official transcript will be a Cariboo
    College transcript, not a Simon Fraser University transcript. In reply to an
    inquiry about Cariboo students going on to post graduate work, S. Shapiro
    indicated that applications from Cariboo will be treated in the same way as
    applications from any other four-year institution. Since the professors are
    Cariboo College staff and the since the students are Cariboo College students
    question was raised as to why Simon Fraser University appears on the degree.
    S. Shapiro replied that at the present time there is no legislative mechanism
    for Cariboo College to grant a four-year degree and that the university-college
    program initiative provides opportunity for the three established universities,
    over the next five years, to assist the colleges to move into degree granting
    status. It was pointed out that Senate Paper S.89-24 does not specify that
    this program is limited to five years. The Chair indicated that the
    Memorandum of Cooperation Cariboo College/Simon Fraser University
    previously approved by Senate did contain a statement with regard to the
    five-year limitation period and that it did apply to this
    .
    particular proposal.
    In opposition to the proposal, opinion was expressed that the document was
    patronizing and the wording of the proposal ambiguous. Concern was
    expressed that the proposed arrangement whereby SFU on one hand provides
    academic respectability for the degree, yet on the other hand, does not wish
    to take responsibility for the students, does not instill full confidence in the
    degree or the program itself and there appeared to be very little in the
    agreement of benefit to the University.
    In reply to an inquiry concerning the procedure
    .
    to be followed regarding
    approval of degrees, R. Heath advised that
    to
    will approve all
    recommendations for the Bachelor of Business Studies degree. Formal official
    transcripts from Cariboo College will be provided for all students
    recommended for graduation. Recommendations will initially go to the
    Faculty of Business Administration and those eligible for graduation will be
    • ?
    recommended to Senate with transcripts for these students being available to
    any interested Senator. Senate was given assurance that funds above and
    beyond the current budget to cover the overhead costs associated with this
    program will accrue to the University.

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 8
    SDiscussion turned to the question of transferability and inquiry was made as
    to what contingency had been set up to handle transfer of students in one
    direction or the other, especially if there is a disparity in the admission
    requirements between the two institutions. Although there is a concern in
    this regard, S. Shapiro indicated he did not feel it was a serious problem and
    felt that it would be up to Cariboo to make sure their local needs were met
    before accepting students from the Lower Mainland. Request was made that
    the document clearly specify students transferring from one institution to the
    other were not guaranteed admission to the respective Business programs
    either at Simon Fraser University or at Cariboo College. S. Shapiro indicated
    the Faculty of Business Administration had no objection to this point of
    clarification and he also believed that Cariboo College would have no
    objection. He felt it might be in the best interest of all concerned to have such
    clarification signed on the record.
    Question was called, and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION CARRIED
    B. Bedford requested that his opposition be noted in the Minutes
    ii) ?
    Paper
    S.89-25 -
    New Grade Notation - NG (No Grade)
    ?
    Moved by R. Saunders, seconded by B. Clayman
    "that Senate approve as set out in S.89-25, the
    introduction of "NG" Notation"
    Since an NG grade would be assigned when the University is unable to assign
    a grade prior to the regular deadline for submission of grades in a semester,
    concern was expressed about the effect of NG grades on students applying for
    graduation, competing for registration priority and, in particular, competition
    for scholarships where it was pointed out that scholarships could be lost to
    students who have an NG grade who would otherwise qualify.
    R. Saunders pointed out that the new notation will assist in alleviating some
    of the current problems associated with those very conditions especially in
    such circumstances where deferred grades are assigned through no fault of
    the student. He went on to explain that deferred grades not only
    disadvantage students from receiving scholarships, they can cause a student
    to be asked to withdraw from the University for insufficient performance.
    This new notation will protect students from being penalized when grades
    cannot be assigned by the required deadline.
    As Chair of the Senate Policy Committee on Scholarships, Awards and
    Bursaries, P. Kennedy confirmed that Open Scholarships would be awarded
    retroactively; however, students could lose out on private scholarships since

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 9
    the University can exercise no control over external procedures. L. Palmer
    . felt it should be possible to defer scholarship eligibility pending receipt of the
    final grade. He suggested deliberations could be made without these students
    and, after their grades are determined, they could be inserted in the
    deliberations, and the university should indemnify any students that
    happened to be eligible for a private scholarship slot. He felt the number of
    students would be rather small and he did not feel it would cost very much to
    take this extra step. P. Kennedy indicated that he would take these
    suggestions to the next meeting of the Senate Policy Committee on
    Scholarships, Awards and Bursaries for review.
    Inquiry was made as to how the NG notation would be implemented in cases,
    for example, where faculty members for reasons of self-interest prefer to
    give deferred grades to an entire class rather than NG grades. In such cases,
    the intent of this proposal is to allow the Dean of the Faculty to advise the
    Registrar that NG grades are to be assigned. It was pointed out, however, that
    if an individual faculty member submits deferred grades for all students in a
    course the Chair/Director is expected to determine the reason for the
    extraordinary action prior to countersigning the grade list and, if necessary,
    the Dean of Faculty consulted to resolve the matter.
    • ?
    Discussion turned to definition of the new grade notation.
    ?
    Moved by B. Clayman, seconded by B. Bedford
    "that the notation "NG" No Grade be amended to
    "GN" Grade Not Reported"
    Question was called on the amendment
    and a vote taken.
    ?
    AMENDMENT CARRIED
    Concern was expressed about the shortness of time between the date a final
    exam is given and the deadline for submission of grades, and it was noted
    that in very large classes with a concentrated final exam it is almost
    impossible to meet the deadline in the length of time allowed. Suggestion was
    made that the appropriate Senate committee look into this problem. R. Heath
    replied that the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Studies is presently
    considering this problem. A number of alternatives such as adding an extra
    day for examinations and considering day sections the same as evening
    sections to allow the exam schedule to flow are among those being
    investigated.
    40
    In reply to an inquiry about the earlier discussion concerning policy
    procedure for scholarship students, the Chair indicated that the Senate Policy
    Committee on Scholarships, Awards and Bursaries will bring forward a
    proposal to Senate which, if accepted, will be added as a further condition of

    S.M. 05/06/89
    Page 10
    the new grade notation.
    Question was called on the motion, as amended
    and a vote taken.
    ?
    MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED
    6.
    OTHER BUSINESS
    There was no other business.
    7.
    NOTICES OF MOTION
    There were no notices of motion.
    8.
    INFORMATION
    The date of next regularly scheduled meeting of Senate is Monday, July 10,
    1989.
    The Assembly moved directly into Closed Session at 6:40 p.m.
    W.R. Heath
    Registrar and Secretary of Senate
    .
    0

    Back to top